Details of a pedestrian bridge in ireland taken with a drone

Bridge inspection

Conducting an inspection of a pedestrian bridge using a drone.
Overview

The Job at a Glance

A drone inspection of a complex 350-metre steel pedestrian bridge at Limerick University, using the DJI Mini 3 Pro and Mavic 3 Enterprise to capture detailed imagery and high-resolution video of every structural component — including the underside, piers, cable trusses and termination points.

Limerick University footbridge

350-metre, six-span cable-truss pedestrian bridge crossing the River Shannon. Inspected without rope access, scaffolding, or working at height.

Two days in the field

Data capture completed over two summer days during reduced campus population. Flights above the parapet conducted early morning to minimise disruption.

Dual-drone approach

249 g DJI Mini 3 Pro and Mavic 3 Enterprise — small, lightweight, low-noise platforms suitable for a conservation area with nesting birds.

Detailed imagery and HD video

Comprehensive visual record of all bridge substructures, including cable arms, shoes, span bearings, soffit, and tetrapod piers.

Comparative methodology

Why they chose a drone

For this inspection, we chose a drone because it delivered faster, safer, and more detailed results than traditional rope access or scaffolding — without closing the bridge or working above water.

Safety
No working at height vs rope access or scaffolding

The drone pilot operated from safe ground positions. No personnel needed to climb the bridge structure, work over water, or use access equipment.

Cost
Fraction of traditional vs scaffolding or MEWP hire

Eliminated the need for scaffolding, platforms, and personnel working at height. The road and footpath remained open throughout.

Data quality
HD imagery + video vs limited visual inspection

Every structural component was captured in high detail — including the soffit, cable trusses, piers, and span bearings — giving engineers far more data than a physical climb could provide.

Efficient option Our method

Using a drone

A safer, faster, and more detailed approach using small, lightweight drone platforms.

  • No working at height All inspection work carried out remotely from safe ground positions. No scaffolding, MEWPs, or rope access required.
  • Full underside coverage The drone captured every area not visible from the bridge deck — piers, soffit, cable trusses, and span bearings.
  • Bridge remained open No closures were needed. Early-morning flights above the parapet avoided peak pedestrian traffic.
  • Conservation-area suitable Low-noise drones were selected specifically to avoid disturbing nesting birds in the surrounding special area of conservation.
  • Detailed defect photography The pilot captured extra imagery of any possible defect that warranted further investigation, giving engineers complete data to work with.
  • Two-day field programme Data capture was completed efficiently during the summer months when the campus population was reduced.
Project status Complete and verified
Manned approach Traditional method

Without a drone

What the job would have looked like if drones were not used.

  • Scaffolding or MEWP required Access equipment would need to be brought to each pier location, including spans crossing water where deployment is difficult.
  • Working at height over water Personnel would need to climb the bridge structure or work from suspended platforms above the river, introducing significant safety risk.
  • Bridge closures likely Access equipment on the bridge deck or towpath would require full or partial closures, disrupting university life.
  • Higher cost, longer programme Mobilising scaffolding or rope-access teams increases both the budget and the time required for the inspection.
  • Limited photographic record A physical inspection cannot produce the same comprehensive, high-resolution visual record that engineers can review in detail afterwards.
Operational impact Higher cost, risk and disruption
The challenge

Inspecting a complex steel pedestrian bridge

The bridge in question is a 350-meter long footbridge consisting of six cable-truss spans, supported by a pair of under-slung catenary cables with tetrapod piers between each span. The majority of the bridge is made from painted steel. The bridge is located in Limerick University. It was constructed in 2007, and while it is regularly inspected, the intricate design of the bridge makes it difficult to inspect thoroughly.

A view looking down of the tetrapod pier of this bridge showing some corroded areas where the surface finish has failed.
A view looking down of the tetrapod pier of this bridge showing some corroded areas where the surface finish has failed.

The University management along with their sub-contractor contracted Engineers With Drones to carry out the inspection of the bridge. The drone used for the inspection was equipped with a high-definition camera, allowing for detailed imaging of the bridge's various components.

This image shows the bridge from above. This shows how difficult it would be to conduct an inspection over the side of the parapet given the unique design of this particular bridge.
This image shows the bridge from above. This shows how difficult it would be to conduct an inspection over the side of the parapet given the unique design of this particular bridge.
The Methodology

Drone selection and job execution

The choice of drone was very important on this project as the bridge was not only located in a heavily trafficked public space but also a special area of conservation with nesting birds in the surrounding areas. These conditions meant that large loud drones were immediately excluded from the list. In the end we chose to use a combination of the 249 gram DJI Mini 3 Pro and the Mavic 3 Enterprise. Both of which are small, light and low noise modern drones.

A view looking up at of the arms of the tetrapod pier showing some corroded areas of the soffit and also a  missing light fixture.
Looking up at of the arms of the tetrapod pier showing some corroded areas of the soffit and also a missing light fixture.

The drone was flown around the bridge at various altitudes and angles to capture the images required for the inspection. The drone pilot was able to control the drone's movements remotely, allowing them to capture images of even the most difficult to reach areas of the bridge, including the underside of the bridge. The pilot moved to various operating locations in order to ensure the best angle to view the drone.

The primary target of the inspection was everything that was not visible while walking across the bridge. This means the piers, soffit cable trusses and cable arms and shoes. Also included were the cable termination points and the span bearings.

A view of the cable arms and shoes showing some corroded areas where the surface finish has failed.
A view of the cable arms and shoes showing some corroded areas where the surface finish has failed.

A draft image capture plan was generated by Engineers With Drones. This was then relayed to the client to assess if it suitable for their needs. Final adjustments were made and the plan was locked in. Engineers With Drones were also tasked with getting extra imagery of any possible defect they considered warranted further investigation.

A view of a drone operator in the field. As you can see the landscape doe not lend itself to bringing MEWPs and other access equipment in. Especially on the spans that cross water.
A view of a drone operator in the field. As you can see the landscape doe not lend itself to bringing MEWPs and other access equipment in. Especially on the spans that cross water.

Data capture took two days in the field. This was conducted during the summer months when there was a much reduced population at the university. Flights above the parapet of the bridge were conducted early morning when there was less chance of person using the bridge.

In the video above we see typical overview footage of the bridge soffit. This footage is used to get an overall idea of the condition of the bridge. Detailed defect photography was also used to provide more detailed analysis of individual defects. This is best viewed full screen and high-resolution to appreciate the detail in the video.
Findings

Post-processing and analysis

Once field work was complete the images were sorted, processed and relayed to the client for analysis. The engineers were able to review the images in detail and identify any areas of the bridge that required attention. The detailed images captured by the drone allowed the client to identify cracks, rust spots, and other areas of potential damage that would have been difficult to detect using traditional inspection methods.

Deliverables

Detailed underside imagery

Comprehensive photographic record of all bridge substructures, including the soffit, cable trusses, and every component not visible from the bridge deck.

High-resolution video footage

Overview video of the bridge soffit captured in high resolution, giving engineers an immediate visual understanding of overall structural condition.

Pier-specific video documentation

Dedicated high-resolution video of each tetrapod pier, providing detailed visual access to areas that would otherwise require rope access or scaffolding over water.

A detailed view of the cross bracing of the bridge deck structure showing corrosion of some of the painted steel elements. Apart from some biological growth the stainless steel tie rods look to be in good condition.
A detailed view of the cross bracing of the bridge deck structure showing corrosion of some of the painted steel elements. Apart from some biological growth the stainless steel tie rods look to be in good condition.
Outcome

A safer, more efficient approach to bridge inspection

The use of drones for the inspection of complex steel lattice pedestrian bridges is a game-changer for the bridge inspection industry. Drones provide a more efficient, accurate, and safer way of inspecting these structures, ultimately resulting in a safer environment for the public. As technology advances, we can expect drones to become an even more integral part of the bridge inspection process, providing a cost-effective and reliable way of maintaining these crucial infrastructure assets.

A view of the cable arms and shoes from inside the bridge structure. You can see some biological growth along with some corroded area along the corners of the left hand cable arms.
A view of the cable arms and shoes from inside the bridge structure. You can see some biological growth along with some corroded area along the corners of the left hand cable arms.

This eliminated the need for scaffolding, platforms and personnel working at height. It also meant that personnel did not have to work above the water. The fact that all this equipment was no longer required also meant that the road could remain open during the inspection.

Let's talk

Speak to an engineer about your project

Complex surveys and inspections require more than just a pilot. Our engineers can help you scope your requirements and indentify the right approach.

Talk to an engineer

+353 (0)21 202 8281

Quickest for technical scoping

Email your brief

info@engineerswithdrones.ie

Best for sending detailed specs

Next steps

Where to find out more

You can find out more about our bridge inspection capabilities here. Alternatively you can contact us here.

Last Updated: