Coastal cliff view showing the road hugging the cliffside above the sea at Mountain Stages, Kerry

Survey of a cliffside road in Kerry

Mountain Stages, County Kerry Replicating previous survey angles for like-for-like comparison of coastal erosion and landslide activity over time.
Overview

The Job at a Glance

An engineering company working on behalf of Kerry County Council needed technical imagery of a section of cliffside road at a place called Mountain Stages in Kerry. The road runs about halfway up a very steep hill or cliff — straight down to the sea, and up to the mountain. The area had been monitored for landslides and coastal erosion since around 2015, and a previous drone survey had been carried out in 2018. Engineers With Drones was brought in to replicate those exact survey angles with modern equipment, giving the client a like-for-like comparison of how the land had changed over time.

Mountain Stages, Kerry

A 2km section of cliffside road at Mountain Stages, Kerry — halfway up a steep coastal cliff with the sea below and the mountain above. Monitored for landslides and coastal erosion since 2015.

Mavic 3 Pro

A small, three-lens drone with wide, medium, and zoom cameras — providing both overview imagery and detailed defect capture from a single platform.

Like-for-like comparison

Every angle from the 2018 survey was replicated exactly. The client could compare the same spot, at the same angle, six years apart — making changes immediately visible.

Cloud platform delivery

All imagery organised by road section, annotated with defect identifiers from the previous report, and delivered on the client's platform of choice.

Background

A road under constant threat from the elements

The section of road at Mountain Stages runs about halfway up a very steep hill or cliff. Straight down from the road is the sea; up is the mountain. The area has been monitored for landslides and coastal erosion since around 2015 — an ongoing concern for a road that provides essential access along this stretch of the Kerry coastline.

A drone survey was carried out back in 2018 by a different company. At the time it was considered very modern and futuristic, and it provided low-resolution but useful imagery of the state of the area. That report became the baseline for all subsequent monitoring.

As Bob Foley, founder of Engineers With Drones, explains: "They gave us the previous report and that always helps a lot because it's very, very useful if you're reporting on an ongoing situation to be able to present back to the client like for like so they can say, okay, this is that exact spot. This is the exact same angle looking at this spot. And this is what it looked like five years ago. And this is what it looks like right now."

Aerial view of the coastal road running between the mountain and the sea at Mountain Stages, Kerry
The 2km section of cliffside road at Mountain Stages, running along the coast between the mountain and the sea. An area monitored for landslides and coastal erosion since 2015.
Challenge

Replicating history with precision

The main challenge was not just to capture current imagery of the cliffside — it was to capture it from the exact same angles, at the exact same locations, as the 2018 survey. Without that precision, the comparison would be meaningless. A defect photographed from a different angle could look completely different, making it impossible to tell whether the change was real or just a trick of perspective.

The previous report was essential. Engineers With Drones used it to generate an imagery capture plan before even setting foot on site, mapping out exactly where to position the drone to match each historical shot. This preparation meant the fieldwork could proceed efficiently, with no time wasted figuring out angles on the day.

Detailed view of erosion features and vegetation along the roadside embankment at Mountain Stages, Kerry
Detailed imagery showing erosion features and vegetation along the roadside embankment — the type of defect identified and documented during the survey for like-for-like comparison with the 2018 baseline.
Equipment

A small drone with three lenses for every shot

The Mavic 3 Pro was chosen for this job. It is a small enough drone that it is not dangerous in open countryside, but it carries three separate lenses — wide, medium, and zoom. That gave the team the ability to capture wide overview imagery for spatial context, and then zoom in on specific defects for detailed close-ups, all from the same flight.

The drone also has excellent video characteristics, and the client wanted video footage of the full 2km section as well as stills. The zoom lens was particularly useful for capturing detailed imagery of erosion features and landslide-prone areas without needing to bring the drone dangerously close to the cliff face.

Close-up detail of erosion and defect features along the cliffside road embankment
Detailed defect imagery captured using the Mavic 3 Pro's zoom lens, showing erosion features along the roadside embankment.
Methodology

From previous report to finished dataset

On site, the team captured all the imagery over the course of a single day. The previous report guided every shot — each historical angle was replicated, and additional imagery was captured wherever new defects or areas of interest were identified.

Back in the office, the full dataset was processed and married against the previous report. The 2km road section was divided into smaller sections, and every image was assigned to its relevant section. Where the previous report had annotated defects with specific identifiers, Engineers With Drones applied the same identifiers to the contemporary imagery — making it trivially easy for the client to find the current image of any previously identified defect.

The final dataset was delivered on a cloud platform of the client's choosing.

Outcome

A stark difference in quality — and a clear picture of change

The difference in image quality between the 2018 survey and this one was very stark. As Bob notes: "Even though the last drone that flew this was about the size of a coffee table, large drone with a big old camera on it, the imagery was relatively low quality when last done. Whereas this one, each image was at least 20 megapixels, very high resolution, a lot of detail, and because all the angles were the same, you can get a lot more idea of exactly what you were dealing with in terms of the coastal erosion, geomorphology, all that sort of stuff."

The person responsible for analysing the imagery and assessing the current state of the road had a much better understanding of the actual topography of the land, and could make a far more informed decision about whether the road was safe to continue using. The client was very happy with the result.

Deliverables

What the client received

High-resolution still imagery

20MP+ still images captured at every angle from the 2018 survey, plus additional coverage of new defects and areas of interest identified on site.

Video footage of the full section

High-resolution video captured along the entire 2km section, providing continuous visual context alongside the still imagery.

Annotated defect identifiers

Previously identified defects annotated with the same identifiers used in the 2018 report, making cross-referencing immediate and unambiguous.

Section-organised dataset

The road divided into manageable sections with all imagery assigned to its relevant area, delivered on the client's preferred cloud platform.

Comparative methodology

Why they chose us

The only alternative to getting this imagery was to fly a helicopter just off the coastline, or to abseil down the cliff — neither of which would provide the consistent, repeatable angles needed for a meaningful comparison with the 2018 survey. A drone was the only way to capture every angle precisely, safely, and cost-effectively.

Imagery quality
20MP+ resolution vs low-res 2018 survey

Each image at least 20 megapixels, captured at the exact same angles as the previous survey. The quality difference was stark — even though the 2018 drone was physically larger.

Safety
Zero cliffside risk vs abseiling or helicopter

No personnel needed on the cliff face. The drone operated safely from the road above, in open category airspace with no public safety concerns.

Survey accuracy
Exact angle replication vs inconsistent manual capture

Having the previous report meant every shot could be planned to match the original angles. A helicopter or abseiling team could not achieve the same precision.

Efficient option Our method

Using a drone

A safe, precise approach that delivered high-resolution imagery matching exactly what was captured in 2018.

  • Exact angle replication from previous survey The 2018 report was used to plan the capture. Every angle was matched precisely, so the client could see like-for-like change at every location.
  • Three-lens camera for wide and close-up capture The Mavic 3 Pro's wide lens captured overview imagery of the full 2km section, while the zoom lens provided detailed close-ups of specific defects and erosion features.
  • 20MP+ high-resolution imagery Every image captured at 20 megapixels or higher, providing far more detail than the 2018 survey despite using a smaller drone.
  • One day of fieldwork The entire 2km section was captured in a single day, including replication of all previous angles and additional coverage of newly identified defects.
  • Organised by section with annotated defects The road was divided into sections. Images were assigned to their relevant section, and previously annotated defects were tagged with their original identifiers.
Project status Completed and delivered
Traditional approach Alternative method

Without a drone

The slower, more expensive, and less precise conventional approach.

  • Helicopter or abseiling required The only way to get similar imagery without a drone would be to fly a helicopter just off the coastline or to abseil down the cliff — both expensive and operationally complex.
  • Harder to replicate exact angles Positioning a helicopter or an abseiler at the exact same angle as a survey six years earlier is nearly impossible. The drone could be positioned precisely using the previous report as a guide.
  • No overview perspective Standing on the cliff face gives only a close-up view. The drone provided both the overview and the detail — essential for understanding the full geomorphological context.
  • Significantly higher cost A full day of helicopter time, or multiple days of rope access, would cost substantially more than a drone survey — with lower quality results.
Operational impact Expensive, imprecise, and higher risk
Let's talk

Speak to an engineer about your project

Complex surveys and inspections require more than just a pilot. Our engineers can help you scope your requirements and indentify the right approach.

Talk to an engineer

+353 (0)21 202 8281

Quickest for technical scoping

Email your brief

info@engineerswithdrones.ie

Best for sending detailed specs

Video

Drone footage of the cliffside road survey

Video footage captured during the survey, showing the full 2km section of cliffside road at Mountain Stages and the surrounding coastal terrain.

Drone footage showing the full 2km section of cliffside road at Mountain Stages, Kerry — captured during the 2024 survey for like-for-like comparison with the 2018 baseline.
Aerial view of the cliffside road and surrounding coastline at Mountain Stages
Oblique view of the coastal road and erosion zone
Aerial perspective of the road running along the cliff face
Aerial view of the cliffside and sea below
Detailed view of erosion features along the roadside
Oblique aerial view of the cliff face and road structure
Close-up view of landslide-prone areas on the cliff face
Detailed imagery of coastal erosion at the road embankment
Aerial view of the road and surrounding geomorphology
Perspective view of the cliffside road from above
Wide coastal view showing road position and sea below
Overview of the Mountain Stages coastline and monitored section
Next steps

Where to find out more

If you manage coastal infrastructure, roads, or erosion-prone assets and need high-resolution aerial data for condition monitoring, drone-based surveying could be the solution. Explore related services and case studies below.

Last Updated: